The best estate plan will not work if beneficiary designations and asset titling are not coordinated with the provisions of the will and trust. Common mistakes includeadding a child’s name to a house deed, adding one child as the transfer on death beneficiary of a financial account to the exclusion of the other children, or not avoiding the probate process by transferring the asset to a trust or adding a transfer on death designation.
I always provide my clients with a list of how to address beneficiary designations and asset titling issues. If the issues are not handled properly, one child can inadvertently inherit most of the estate to the chagrin, and lasting contempt and hostility, of the other children.
At the risk of beating the dead horse about digital assets, some articles need to be mocked. This recent WSJ article deserves derision for making a simple topic – how to access on-line accounts of a deceased person – stupidly complex.
Suggestions include the creation of a social media will with a review of each web site’s policies, the nomination of a digital or social media executor, and creation of digital asset trust to avoid those assets going through the probate process. My responses to these ideas, in order are: a standard will suffices, the executor should be able to address on-line issues and if he can not he should not be the executor dealing with assets with a monetary value, and only an idiot would list a digital account as a probate asset to be disposed of. I suspect that some people think that there is money to be made from that idiot by selling him a trust that he does not need.
My advice remains creating a list of passwords accessible at death by the executor. Simple is better and often times less expensive.