- Sunday, 09 August 2015 19:09
Following up on the most recent post. The 21 and 17 year old daughters of Maurice Laboz, who left them each $10 million in trust but provided that they can receive the funds earlier if they meet certain conditions, are reportedly going to court this week to challenge the list of conditions. Their mother is also set to contest the will of her estranged husband.
Several quick points:
1. As stated ad nauseam here, the grounds for contesting a will or trust are two: lack of mental capacity or undue influence. The detailed conditions imposed by Mr. Laboz show a clarity of thought which rules out lack of mental capacity.
2. Infrequently, the terms of a trust can be challenged because they are against public policy such as when a trust prohibits a beneficiary from marrying a person from a different faith or race.
3. Rather than being against public policy, some would argue that it is good public policy to keep millions out of the hands of 21 and 17 year old beneficiaries.
4. Others would also argue that it is good public policy to prohibit teens and 20-somethings from adding to the national tattoo epidemic.
- Wednesday, 29 July 2015 20:53
Maurice Laboz was a NYC real estate investor worth $37 million when he died earlier this year. He left $10 million in trust for each of his daughters and provided that they will receive their inheritance when they reach 35. However, they may receive funds earlier if they abide by his wishes of signing a pre-nuptial agreement prior to marriage ($500K) and graduating from an accredited college and describing the use of trust funds distributed early ($750K). They will also receive a distribution of 3x their annual salary each April 15 and distributions for staying at home with children born in wedlock (3% of the trust value annually). He also disinherited his wife whom he was in the process of divorcing.
Several quick points:
1. Funded trusts are a great vehicle for disinheriting a spouse in the midst of a divorce proceeding. Otherwise, the estranged spouse is entitled to a percentage of the estate at death (1/3 in Ohio).
2. Incentive trusts such as Mr. Laboz’s are good for imposing one’s wishes and values from the grave upon one’s descendants.
3. Personally, I favor a trust clause that distributes 10% of my children’s inheritance to charity for each tattoo that they have, visible or not.