- Wednesday, 10 January 2018 20:44
The estate of Whitney Houston settled its dispute with the IRS over outstanding estate taxes. The IRS had contended that the valuation of Houston’s back catalog and image and likeness was undervalued by $22 million resulting in $11 million of additional taxes. The settlement was for $2 million. Oddly, or perhaps not given the state of journalism in 2018, the focus of most articles was on the value of her image and likeness but the IRS and the estate differed on that valuation by only $200K.
A few small points:
1. Since the death of Michael Jackson, the IRS has been taxing the image and likeness of dead celebrities with the value based on expected licensing revenues in the future.
2. Cool fact – Robin Williams said that his likeness cannot be used for 40 years after his death rendering its value worthless.
3. In the age of streaming music, the longer the estate held out the less valuable the back catalog of albums became.
4. This was purely a principled, but unemotional, victory for the estate. Houston’s daughter died nearly 3 years ago and Houston was divorced. Any estate tax savings will benefit her mother and her brothers.
- Wednesday, 04 May 2016 21:27
When Britney Spears had her breakdown in 2008 (think shaved head and window smashing), her father and attorney became her conservators
. In Ohio, they would be known as guardians. They manage both her physical well being and her finances. As such, they make sure she takes her medicine for her unspecified illness as well as manage her career.
In recent years, Britney, who has been described as shy has not testified at hearings about continuing the conservatorship. She reportedly is only interested in seeing her sons. Her father receives 1.5% of the $17.5 million annual revenues from her Planet Hollywood shows and the same cut from the merch sales. Her court appointed attorney has received $2 million in fees since 2008 and the other conservators have received $6.7 million.
Three brief points:
1. Britney clearly needed someone to assist her in 2008 while she was crumbling. She is likely still alive, while Michael Jackson and Prince are not, because of that.
2. Guardianships can be temporary and Britney’s seems to be a perfect example of temporary intervention being all that is required. She should have the right to make stupid decisions on her own.
3. I doubt that I am the only one who read the NYT article who thought that Britney was nothing more than a trained seal performing at the behest of her inner circle for the reward of seeing her sons.
- Wednesday, 27 April 2016 20:55
Three brief points:
1. A bank trustee is perfect for this role when no family members have experience in managing such a large amount of assets.
2. I hope the trustee does not quickly resume Prince’s habit of sending take down notices to Youtube for all of his videos posted in recent days. His Super Bowl performance is worth 12 minutes of your time.
3. Did anyone truly believe that Michael Jackson, who left a will, would provide for his death in a better manner than Prince?
- Saturday, 15 February 2014 17:36
As noted earlier, when Paul Walker’s executor filed his will with the probate court, he estimated his future income at $8 million and this total estate at $25 million. Also, as noted last Fall, the Executors of Michael Jackson’s estate are battling the IRS over the value of his estate, which they declared to be only $7 million but the IRS contends is worth more than $1 billion. The discrepancy stems largely over the value of MJ’s likeness for commercial purposes (t shirts, merchandise) and the value of his musical catalog which also includes Beatles songs. His estate valued them at $2,100 and $0 respectively. The IRS valued them at a combined $900 million.
1. If Paul Walker will earn $8 million post-mortem, a $7 million valuation for Jackson’s estate is ludicrous.
2. The King of Pop grossed $160 million in 2013, more than any other celebrity belying the low valuation of his music if not his likeness.
3. I doubt that the image of a deceased entertainer with MJ’s murky past is worth $450 million, but it is worth more than $2,100.
4. It might seem like the IRS “won’t stop ’til it gets enough” and the issues are “black or white,” but the estate’s stated values are “bad” if not “dangerous” and could make his family “scream” if they do not “beat it.”
- Thursday, 29 August 2013 15:43
I previously blogged about the income earned by Michael Jackson’s estate since his death. His estate is now embroiled in a dispute with the IRS over the value of his estate and the commensurate estate taxes owed. His estate representatives claimed a total estate value of $9 million on his estate tax return while valuing his image and likeness at only $2,000, while the IRS values the image and likeness at $434 million and the total estate at more than $1 billion.
1. This issue is different than paying income taxes on the earnings since his death. Those taxes have presumably been paid.
2. The IRS valuation seems very high while the estate value seems too low. MJ had borrowed extensively prior to his death to support his lifestyle, including his zoo, and was planning a series of London concerts to pay off the debt. The debt would reduce the value of his estate by $500 million or so.
3. I would love to negotiate with the estate and buy the right to market MJ’s image at their stated value of $2,000.
4. Estate taxes are levied on the value of assets at the time of death. At the time of his death, MJ was not listed as a billionaire by Forbes, had not had an endorsement since 1993, and was not on Forbes’ list of top earning musicians in 2008 the year prior to his death. No one could predict how popular he would be in death. Child molestation rumors, erratic behavior, dangling babies from balconies, and continual disfiguring plastic surgery have a way of frightening advertisers, shrinking a fan base, and reducing earnings.
5. The Police earned $115 million in 2008 and were Forbes top earning artist of the year. Huh?